Teufel Hunden for 'Piss on you," perhaps?
Is any unimaginable 'outrage' sparked by rowdy Leather Neckers unwinding by taking a leak on the faces of freshly killed jerks worrying about the wrong thing?
"This behavior dishonors the sacrifices and core values of every service member representing the 50 nations of the coalition"Oh, please! Seriously?
Yours truly hit up 2 Army Field Graders that both agreed - it ain't cool.
Major Lyons of West Point Radio and CBS News Radio network On-Air Military Analyst:
"It's never ok Courtney, like it or not, we have a higher standard - it's called respect - sad not one Marine of four stopped it - poor discipline in that unit"Major Burke of USAREUR and Wings Over Iraq says it violates Great Satan's Higher Standards:
"I would say so. How do we maintain the moral high ground? Could you piss on a prisoner?"Is dissing dead Taliban truly a sin? After all, these are the voltigueres of intolerant girl face slicer offers, girl beaters, innocent civilian killers/tormenters and creepy nastiness in general.
A certain Teufel Hunden NCO pointed out in private correspondence it could have been worse - using freshly bleached skulls as HumVee hood ornaments
In contrast - Teufel Hunden at Fallujah were somewhat appreciative of doped up, amped up insurgentcy efforts to retrieve wounded or fallen comrades and weaponry and tho't enough to mercy kill serious wounded effing fakers on Holy Ground. LOL! Paradise in the shadow of the blade indeed!
The COL G friendly, kill and break stuff COINlicious K2C Document makes the literally killer point about combatty ops and the hello of winning friends and influencing ppl
The population should not be asked to pick sides. They should merely be informed that the Army will win, and that should be demonstrated to them, as forcefully and unequivocally as possible. No one should be confused that if you fight the Army/Security Forces, you will die or be captured. Evidence should be literally laid before them. There should be no more complicated message than that. (Editorial note - the slanted words got all slanted courtesy Courtney)
Another common issue raised in defence of a seeking a greater cultural understanding is that of the risk of “blood feuds.” This is nearly always mooted in terms that unnecessary lethal force creates unnecessary enemies, as in killing one insurgent somehow creates more. This idea rests on a great many unexamined assumptions, and almost no actual evidence.
It may have happened. So what? Tribal peoples who are familiar with the blood feud idea do not use its existence as an objection to violenceDirect hit! Fire For Effect! Even the Taliban Peace Talkers dismiss the incident as not worthy of worry
"This is not a political process, so the video will not harm our talks and prisoner exchange because they are at the preliminary stage."Getting all LOLable leaky over recent perfumed gardens of paradise haj'ing killers is actually a wonderful unconflicting signal to signal:
Standards aside - it effectively communicates Great Satan"s uparmored cats are not particularly interested in dead head choppers, disputes Talibani ideas are worth dying for or getting pizz'd on and underscores the hap hap happy fact that Great Satan's Globe, Eagle and Anchor Leather Neckers built the modern world.
And they know their way around.
Pic - "Sometimes you bring them the love. Sometimes you bring them the hate.”